Danny Mullins

I am a recent college graduate of Rutgers University, and this is a selection of my works.

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Fraudcast News, Mr. Burns, and the Allegory of Simpsons

Originally appeared as a paper for Isra Ali's Development of Mass Media, Fall 2007.

When one wants to think of pure, unending corporate evil, there is no better place to look on modern animated television than Charles Montgomery Burns, owner of Springfield’s nuclear power plant on the Simpsons. But what happens when Mr. Burns wants to improve his public image? Writer Don Payne explores this in the fifteen season’s season finale for The Simpsons, the episode Fraudcast News. What we find analyzing this episode is the tendency for Mr. Burns to take the worst characteristics of modern corporate media and taking them to extremes not regularly found in real life. However, art is imitating life for Monty, especially in the areas of consolidation of media ownership and the distribution of his personal views through corporate media. 

The main story arc of the episode begins with the “death” of Mr. Burns, when a local tourist attraction collapses during a dedication ceremony and the ensuing rock slide buries Mr. Burns. Unbeknownst to the locals, Burns survives this “death” on insects, animal milk and a snakelike contortionism. Burns returns to his office to watch news reports on how the public is reacting to his death. Burns is shocked to learn that he is not the beloved elder statesman he believed himself to be. 
Meanwhile, the local tourist attraction, Geezer Rock, is celebrated for its time as a historical monument for Springfield, and for crushing Mr. Burns. Lisa Simpson writes a poem to celebrate the rock, which she was initially to read at the dedication. After the opportunity passes, she receives the suggest to print it for herself from her mother, which begins the creation of her very own newspaper, the Red Dress Press, which will come into play much later on within the story. 
Meanwhile, Mr. Burns finds people actually celebrating his death and finds them in fear when they realize he is not actually dead. Burns unintentionally foils a plan from Homer, Lenny, and Carl to dance on his grave, leading them to tap-dance away from the graveyard in which he appears.
Depressed over the realization that he is not as loved as he once thought he was, Burns decides to improve his image within the public. For him, “step one, amass a vast media empire.” (Fraudcast News, 8:15) Mr. Burns’ first move as a media mogul is to purchase local Channel 6 from its long-time owner, whose family has owned the channel for multiple generations. While the owner is steadfastly against selling at first, Burns’ increasingly higher offers finally elicit a joyous acceptance of terms, with the former owner proceeding to jump in the offered bag of money with the offered supermodel and the offered ice cream sundae. While this is the first move, it is certainly not the last as Burns proceeds to purchase radio station KBBL, firing the local DJs in the process, and adding the station to the Burns Media empire. He also buys out the Springfield Shopper, and finally, the local skywriters, who spell out the message “Burns is Nice.” (Fraudcast News, 9:42) Burns also publishes the Burns Weekly, and buys the rights to Itchy and Scratchy, allowing him to take control of the Itchy and Scratchy program, which will be returned to later in the essay.
Within the market model demonstrated by Croteau and Hoynes, Burns Media is an example of a homogenized monopoly. Described by Croteau and Hoynes as the “least desirable from a market perspective,” Burns Media does not tolerate competition and buys out (almost) all media in the community of Springfield. The programming and editorial content revolve around lionizing its owner, Mr. Burns. (Croteau and Hoynes, The Business of Media, p. 15)
On top of all of this, Burns turns the local newscast into a forum for praising him. “Booberella” plays the point to Kent Brockman’s point, and if that doesn’t sound quite right, it’s because it’s not. Burns has turned his media outlet into a public image machine, only giving out positive information about him, manipulating editorial content to keep him appearing in a positive light, and using sex to distract people from the larger issue, especially within the context of Booberella’s large bosom.
Burns’ manipulation of the point-counterpoint segments is also symbolic of one of the criticisms pointed out by Croteau and Hoynes. A major point of criticism for the market model, within the public sphere model, is that the market model can be insufficient for citizens and democracy. The need to satisfy a specific demographic may override debate in order to not lose the target demographic. (Croteau and Hoynes, p. 24) In the case of the Kent Brockman/Booberella debate, there was nothing even close to democratic or even close to resembling a debate. The target demographic for the debate was Montgomery Burns, the topic was Montgomery Burns, and the answer to any questions posed within the debate was pro. Mr. Burns. 
Returning to the case of content within The Itchy and Scratchy Show, Burns’ treatment of Itchy and Scratchy finds an allegorical brother in the genesis of Captain Planet and the Planeteers. According to the memoirs of Ted’s ex-wife, Jane Fonda, Ted has been an environmentalist since he was a child. His love of nature eventually grew into amateur ornithology, allowing him to recognize many birds solely by their wings. He also put work into obtaining and rebroadcasting environmentally based documentaries, especially ones from National Geographic. (Fonda, My Life So Far, p. 471, 477) 
Donna Lee King, in correspondence with an unnamed executive producer for Captain Planet, noted that the producer said, “I had a mandate from Ted to create a superhero, to make a cartoon named Captain Planet.” Captain Planet himself is a pollution fighting superhero, complete with powers to battle evil polluters such as the aptly named Hoggish Greedly. With the help of five ethnically diverse teens and an earth spirit named Gaia, Captain Planet is ready to take on the world’s pollution problems! (King, “Captain Planet and the Planeteers: Kids, Environmental Crisis, and Competing Narratives of the New World Order”, p. 109, 112-114)
Monty Burns, on the other hand, extols the virtues of nuclear power. In a 40 second cartoon short, Itchy and Scratchy play the role of a forklift operator in a business suit and hippie protestor, respectively. Itchy impales Scratchy on a fork lift and drives him through the community, showing him the benefits of nuclear power. From the orphanage full of happy children to the busy hospital, nuclear power keeps Monty’s twisted world running. When Itchy suggests wind power as a safe alternative, the windmill they pass by decapitates the cat. Mr. Burns then appears as a vulture, reminding children that he is a good man, and nuclear power is good as well, while Scratchy implores viewers from his decapitated head to vote Republican. (Fraudcast News, 10:38-11:20)
At this point, Lisa Simpson, who has been publishing the Red Dress Press since the popularity of her original poem made the citizens of Springfield interested in more content from her newspaper, decides to take a stand against Mr. Burns’ media empire. Calling him a “monopolizing, self-aggrandizing… stinky-head,” Lisa speaks out about issues with Burns’ ownership (Fraudcast News, 11:37). Burns is not pleased, and he sends for her, trying to buy her newspaper with a bribe of three ponies. Lisa refuses, and she would be kicked out of Burns office if not for that that her mother wouldn’t be there for another hour. Her paper continues to be published, and Burns becomes angrier.
In Rich Media, Poor Democracy, Robert McChesney, writes that “[t]he simple truth is that for those atop our economy success is based in large part on eliminating [emphasis his] competition.” (McChesney, Rich Media, Poor Democracy, 138) McChesney does not mean it literally within the context of his book, but within Springfield, the interpretation is quite literal. When Lisa refuses to sell, Mr. Burns sends out a gauntlet of obstacles to Lisa’s success as a newspaper. This literal interpretation of eliminating competition includes attacks by car, helicopter, and Segway, culminating in a car crash into a rattlesnake habitat. When this is not enough to deter Lisa, Burns cuts the power to the Simpsons home. When Principal Skinner allows Lisa access to the mimeograph machine, Burns takes a final desperate measure. Burns invites Homer, Lisa’s father, to his office for a talk and subsequently drugs him into revealing secrets about Lisa, including a crush Milhouse has on her. Burns uses this blackmail to publicly humiliate Lisa, culminating in a laser show of Milhouse kissing Lisa projected onto the moon. As can be seen, C. Montgomery Burns will try to win at all costs, eliminating his competition by any means necessary.  
For the conclusion of this analysis, I will examine the interaction of the public sphere within Springfield. According to Starr, the public sphere is open when information is accessible and communication lines are open about topics of the public interest. (Starr, Creation of the Media, p. 25) Within the framework of Fraudcast News, the public sphere becomes closed off when Burns buys up or silences all competition. The eventual reopening, however, can be broken down into a basic catalyst event, but with wider implications for the town. 
Homer’s love for his daughter and need to help her when she’s ready to bow under pressure from Burns inspires him to create the Homer Times. The Times serves as a paper to bolster Lisa’s efforts against Burns. The creation of Homer’s paper begins to reopen the public sphere, with his paper rising from the ashes of the Red Dress Press in order to oppose Mr. Burns’ smear campaign against Lisa. However, that is only one paper. The true reopening of the public sphere occurs with the appearance of new local newspapers. The Burns Media’s Springfield Shopper now competes side by side with such alliterative masterpieces as the Barney Bugle and the Willie World News, along with Patti and Selma’s Twin Spin and Lenny’s Lennysaver, among other newspapers.
This can be classified as a de facto opening of the public sphere. Springfield’s residents watched one of their one lead the way, and once that cue appeared, they realized they had a voice to express as well, even if it is as simple as Barney’s wire service reprints. Now, in the words of Homer Simpson, “instead of one big shot controlling the media, now there’s a thousand freaks Xeroxing their worthless opinions.” (Fraudcast News, 20:06) 

She Needs to Lose 20 Pounds or Gain 60: Production Values in 30 Rock.

Originally written as part of a group project for Isra Ali's Women, Minorities, and Media class, Spring 2008. 

30 Rock, the brainchild of actress/writer/producer Tina Fey, can be viewed within the confines of production processes. It poses a unique opportunity for study as these production processes play out on screen and behind the scenes, as 30 Rock is based upon Ms. Fey’s tenure as head writer on Saturday Night Live, and shows the inner workings of a sketch comedy show trying to make it on the air week after week. (Internet Movie Database [IMDB], 30 Rock Trivia) This scenario, which borders on breaking the fourth wall, makes some analysis of the show as it plays out important as well as analysis of behind the scene when discussing the show. Production processes on 30 Rock and other sitcoms are ingrained in production systems of an establishment, and account for many of the routines seen throughout media. From the beginning, the selection of Ms. Fey’s show over other shows can be interpreted within the production process. Ms. Fey has worked for NBC for over 10 years, beginning at the sketch comedy show, Saturday Night Live. Fey’s work on the show can be interpreted as “paying her dues,” allowing her to establish herself as a talented writer and actress. As Joseph Turow writes, “A person establishing a track record is some who… has shown that he or she is reliable, talented, and ready for more responsibility. This emphasis on paying dues and accumulating a track record ensures that a relatively small number of newcomers will move through the recruitment gauntlet…” (Turow, p. 194)In addition to Tina Fey, the main executive producer of 30 Rock is Lorne Michaels. Michaels is the creative force behind sketch comedy shows such as Kids in the Hall and Fey’s former show Saturday Night Live. In addition to writing capacities, Michaels has either been a producer or executive producer on the show for all 32 seasons of SNL, with the exception of 5 years between 1980 and 1985. (IMBD, Lorne Michaels)However, he has lasted on SNL with relatively sparse help from females. According to data from imdb.com’s credits page, out of over 250 credited writers for the 30 year history of SNL, less than 40 are female, with only 7 female writers credited for more than 100 episodes, compared to 31 males. (IMDB, Saturday Night Live) This is the show 30 Rock was based on, but what about 30 Rock’s writing staff itself? Returning to imdb.com, the writing credits for the show indicate that there is only one other female writer on the show besides Fey; the other 6 co-writers are male, and the episode analyzed in this paper is written by two males, Dave Finkel and Brett Baer. (IMDB, 30 Rock)This power differential carries over to the show within the show. Tina Fey’s Liz Lemon is the only female with any power over TGS with Tracy Jordan, the show-within-the-show. Vice President of East Coast and Microwave Oven Programming Jack Donaghy (portrayed by Alec Baldwin), producer Pete Hornberger (portrayed by Scott Adsit), and show star Tracy Jordan (portrayed by Tracy Morgan) are all male and maintain positions of authority within the show, in Tracy’s case, usurping power from the original star of The Girlie Show, Jenna Maroney, at Donaghy’s insistence. (Fey, 19:47)In general, Lorne Michaels productions, especially 30 Rock and SNL, tend to challenge mainstream authority, balancing between keeping the show on the air and cutting into the institutions that affect the average viewer’s daily life. According to Aaron Reincheld,“[T]he cast and crew of "SNL" have fulfilled a need in American society: to give a mainstream voice to alternative points of view and to question publicly the system and governmental leaders.” (Reincheld, 196)Despite this oppositional view of government and establishment figures, Lorne Michaels shows should not be interpreted as fully oppositional to the establishment, even that of NBC. As Joseph Turow writes, “[Even] when the materials focus on problems of the society… the portrayals should not be considered anti-establishment because they tend not to support radical breaks with traditional ways of doing things.” (Turow, 183)While 30 Rock regularly mocks authority figures such as Jack Donaghy, Fictional NBC CEO Don Geiss, and the President of the United States, there is never a call to overthrow the president, or to restructure the corporate ladder at NBC, within the confines of the show or within the meta-humor of the show. And perhaps it should, as the corporate structure of NBC, which is the network responsible for the fake and the real show, is shown to be extremely complicated in the series. Within the show, NBC is owned by the Sheinhardt Wig Company, which is in turn owned by Pokerfastlane.com, which is owned by JMI, which is owned by Kitchenall, which is in turn owned by GE, according to the episode “The Rural Juror.” (Hubbard, 7:06)  The real-life structure of NBC is somewhat different. According the profile on NBC’s corporate website, NBC is a joint venture between multinational corporations General Electric and Vivendi. While GE does have many subsidiaries, the Sheinhardt Wig Company is not among them. (NBC Universal)30 Rock relies on many casting and situational comedy routines. In particular, Judah Friedlander, who plays the writer Frank, fulfills a casting stereotype. As Frank Rossitano, the creator of the original drag sketch that sends Toofer and Tracy into an argument, Friedlander fulfills the role of a working class buffoon, living in his mother’s basement and being, as Richard Butsch describes, “dumb, immature, irresponsible…” (Butsch, 576) Tracy Morgan’s character Tracy Jordan falls within the clown stereotype as defined by Stuart Hall, and it is questionable whether or not he can truly make a statement on the show or if he is merely comic relief from episode-to-episode. As Hall writes, “It is never quite clear if we are laughing with or at this figure: admiring the physical and rhythmic grace, the open expressivity and emotionality of the ‘entertainer’, or put off by the ‘clown’s’ stupidity.” (Hall, 92)Tracy Morgan is also an example of track record talent. Like Ms. Fey, Morgan made his way through the ranks, building up from his first appearances on SNL, debuting a year before Fey began writing for the show. As an established talent for NBC, NBC took very little risk in hiring him for the role of Tracy Jordan. (IMDB, Tracy Morgan)In addition to Fey and Morgan, NBC took virtually no production risk by hiring Alec Baldwin for the role of Jack Donaghy. Alec Baldwin has made hundreds of appearances in movies, TV shows, and Broadway plays. Baldwin has also hosted the show 12 times, leaving him second only to John Goodman and Steve Martin for amount of times he has hosted SNL. Bringing in Alec Baldwin was nothing but a safe bet for the production staff at 30 Rock. (Internet Movie Database, “Saturday Night Live” Trivia)What one can conclude from all of this is that 30 Rock, though it does consistently poke fun at the establishment, it still continues to serve the establishment in many ways. The writing staff still reflects a male bias, despite the creation of the show by a woman. Its use of stereotypes in casting expose the function of stereotypes, which as Richard Dyer describes, is to be “a very simple, striking, easily grasped form of representation.” (Dyer, 246)The use of stereotypes allows viewers to begin making assumptions before the character begins speaking. One can infer that Frank will be a bit of a slob, based on his stubble, pot belly, and trucker hat. One can infer that Tracy Jordan will be played as a clown, based on minimal interaction with other characters. These stereotypes will be elaborated on by my colleagues in later chapters. The use of track record talent, from production staff to actors and actresses, reduces the financial and social risks that companies take on when producing a show like 30 Rock. (Turow, 194)  The use of Lorne Michaels and Tina Fey, working together again after Fey’s departure from Saturday Night Live, denotes a certain reduction in risk. Michaels as a producer has the power described by Turow to allow himself a certain amount of freedom while producing a show, as long as he and Fey do not exceed boundaries set by the establishment. (Turow, 204) Overall, while it does play out differently than other sitcoms, 30 Rock is still bound by the same production processes as any other sitcom currently on the air on mainstream networks.

Brawl for All

Originally written for Roger Hernandez's News Reporting and Writing, Spring 2008.

Mario, champion of the Mushroom Kingdom, takes a fighting stance. He adjusts his cap, and turns to his eternal opponent…Pikachu?

Welcome to Super Smash Bros. Brawl. 

With new characters, new features and the ability to play online, the newest entry in the Smash Bros. series has many ways to keep gamers occupied for years to come.
Super Smash Bros. Brawl
is the third game in the Super Smash Bros. series. The series, produced by HAL Laboratories, which began on the Nintendo 64 with Super Smash Bros. in 1999, continued with Nintendo GameCube’s Super Smash Bros. Melee in 2001 and now comes to Nintendo’s newest system, the Wii.

Smash Bros. combines the fighting and party game genres with a healthy dose of nostalgia for Nintendo games of the past. Nintendo uses the series as a showcase for its characters, its games, and its history. Games as well-known as Super Mario Bros. share the spotlight with more obscure games like Ice Climber and Clu Clu Land.

“Several memorable characters compete for brawl supremacy—that’s Super Smash Brothers Brawl in a nutshell, “said Masahiro Sakurai, director of Brawl, on the official website smashbros.com.

Nintendo franchises that did not have as big of a presence in Melee came out in full force for Brawl. The character Pit, from Kid Icarus, went from a single mention in the Trophy feature for Melee to a fully fledged character, undergoing a head to toe redesign in the process.

“I like that he’s different… from all the characters,” said Eric Zales, a Rutgers College junior. “If Pit was not there, I would not enjoy Brawl as much.” 

All of the characters in the first two games are from games made by Nintendo, but Brawl introduces two characters made by “third-party” developers, developers who create games for multiple systems. Solid Snake from Konami’s Metal Gear series and Sonic the Hedgehog from Sega join the game for Brawl, and their additions help gamers answer a question 17 years in the making: What would happen if Sonic and Mario got into a fight? 

“[I don’t know] about playing [as] Sonic, but playing against him sure sucks,” said a Rutgers alumnus who wished to only be identified by his gamer tag, “Skip”.

 The newest Super Smash Bros. came to North America March 9th and gamers across the country lined up hundreds at a time to be the first to walk out of the local GameStop with their own copy, but some gamers jumped the gun, importing a copy of the game from its home country of Japan, where the game came out January 31st. 

Stores from Best Buy, the electronics giant, to GameStop, the largest retail store dedicated to video games, to Wal-Mart’s warehouse chain Sam’s Club opened their doors midnight, March 9th to sell copies of Smash Bros. Brawl. 

According a March 17 press release from Nintendo, Brawl sold over 874,000 units during the midnight release alone, with the first week’s total sales at 1.4 million. At the average retail price of $49.99, Brawl sales fall just short of $70 million in its first week alone.

And it did all of that without the major marketing campaign that Microsoft’s X-Box 360 game, Halo 3, had. Halo 3, the current record holder for highest grossing opening day of any entertainment product, was visible from many different forums, from Slurpees to TV commercials to a new flavor of Mountain Dew called Gamer Fuel named after the game. Smash Bros., however, found its home on the internet. 

The Super Smash Bros. Dojo is a blog maintained by Mr. Sakurai and a team of translators, translating Sakurai’s updates into six different languages or dialects. 
According to Alexa.com’s traffic rankings, smashbros.com is ranked 597 in the world, and 221st in the United States, while Halo3.com, the official website for the newest Halo game, has yet to break into the top 1000. While Microsoft has a grip on cross promotion in traditional media, the Internet goes to Brawl.

Brawl is also one of only 7 games on the Wii to take advantage of Nintendo’s Wi-Fi Connection, a free service that allows players to compete against each other online free of charge. Nintendo has a warning on their website that the amount of traffic from Brawl may be overwhelming at peak hours, resulting in an error code for some players trying to access the online service during those hours. But for those players who do not wish to always play, there is a mode called Spectator mode. This mode allows players to watch other gamers play and bet coins won in the regular game on the winner.

So what makes Brawl so appealing to its audience? Is it the competitive aspect? Is it the amount of features and extras available to players? According to Nintendo of America, it’s that it has become more than a simple video game.

 "Super Smash Bros. Brawl has made the leap from video game to cultural phenomenon,” said Nintendo of America’s executive vice president of sales and marketing Cammie Dunaway in a press release.

Fans like Dave Cordes, a Rutgers College senior, however, think the answer is easier than calling it a cultural phenomenon.

 “Smash, people say it’s just a game, but, y’know, it’s our game,” Cordes said. “It’s what we do.” 


Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Works cited.

Series available here:

Political Parties Through the Lens of Alexis De Tocqueville Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Gallup.com, “Homosexual relations,”Gallup.com Accessed April 22, 2008. 

http://www.gallup.com/poll/1651/Homosexual-Relations.aspx

Green, John, and Coffey, Daniel J. (ed.), “Party Coalitions in the American Public” The State of the Parties: People, Passions, and Power. 2007, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Lanham, Maryland.

Hershey, Barbara M. Party Politics in America. 2007. Pearson Education, Inc. United States.

United States Senate. Senate Bill 3930, The Military Commissions Act of 2006. Pub. L. No. 109-366, 120 Stat. 2600, October 2006. Washington. Accessed April 20, 2008. http://intelligence.senate.gov/laws/pl109-366.pdf

United States Senate Democrats. “S. 3930, the Military Commissions Act” Accessed April 20, 2008. http://democrats.senate.gov/dpc/dpc-new.cfm?doc_name=lb-109-2-145

Wikipedia, the free Encyclopedia “Comparison of Politics of Parties of the United States,” accessed April 15, 2008
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_politics_of_parties_of_the_United_States

Wikipedia, the free Encyclopedia “Democratic Party,” accessed April 17, 2008
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_States)

Wikipedia, the free Encyclopedia “George Washington’s Farewell Address “, accessed April 12, 2008 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Washington's_Farewell_Address

Wikipedia, the free Encyclopedia “Howard Dean,” accessed April 25, 2008
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Dean

Wikipedia, the free Encyclopedia “Military Commissions Act of 2006“, accessed April 20, 2008
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Commissions_Act_of_2006

Wikipedia, the free Encyclopedia “Republican Party,” accessed April 17, 2008
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_(United_States)

Political Parties Through the Lens of de Tocqueville, Part 4

This is part 4 of a reposting of a paper I wrote in the Spring of 2008 for Jon McFall's Democratic Political Philsophy class at Rutgers University. Certain points have been redacted for clarity, and will be noted with a *

 While we've seen* that the parties at an organizational and theoretical level can support democratic values, what happens when these parties’ policies are put into practice in legislature? What happens to one’s civil liberties? Tocqueville can be classified as a proponent of positive liberties, as shown in his support and admiration for colonial American public education and social services, (birth, marriage, and death certificate recording, estate management, etc.,) and his frustration that such services were not available in France. So when the writ of habeas corpus is effectively suspended by the executive branch and the legislative branch, Alexis de Tocqueville would be displeased.

 And that is the essence of the Military Commissions Act of 2006.
 The Military Commissions Act was designed to deal with prosecution and detention of enemy combatants. However, there is a clause found in the bill that defines unlawful combatant extremely broadly. As language of the bill says, an unlawful enemy combatant is,
“a person who has engaged in hostilities or who has purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its co-belligerents who is not a lawful enemy combatant (including a person who is part of the Taliban, al Qaeda, or associated forces); or… a person who, before, on, or after the date of the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, has been determined to be an unlawful enemy combatant by a Combatant Status Review Tribunal or another competent tribunal established under the authority of the President or the Secretary of Defense.”  

 That is quite a long definition to essentially say that anyone could be an unlawful enemy combatant, as long as one has President Bush or Secretary Gates’s approval. In addition, the writ of habeas corpus would be suspended for unlawful enemy combatants, essentially allowing those in power to cart blanche detain anyone named as such indefinitely. This is a disgusting violation of civil liberties, and the possibility of this being abused is real. The final roll call in the Senate was 53 Republicans for, 1 against, 1 abstention. Democrats had 12 for, 32 against, no abstentions, and one Independent against. The house bill had a similar divide, and the bill passed.  
 In light of such a gross display of disregard for civil liberties, any progress Republicans made towards classical American democracy is seriously damaged. As Tocqueville says, “I know of only two methods of establishing equality in the political world; every citizen must be put in possession of his rights, or rights must be granted to no one.” 
It would appear that Republicans are leaning towards the latter.

Looking back upon the arguments constructed, there is a dualistic battle over which party effectively applies the values of classic American democracy within the realm of Alexis de Tocqueville’s observations. Democrats are able to reach out to more people, raise funds at the local level more effectively, and bring in a more heterogeneous mix. Republicans, on the other hand, do bring in the religious vote and are general on the same level of outreach and mobilization. 

However, society is fundamentally different from when Alexis de Tocqueville first published Democracy in America over 170 years ago. When Tocqueville initially visited America, America was in a time period with essentially one party politics that lasted from the end of the Federalist party in the mid 1810s to the rise of the first serious challenge from the Whig party When Tocqueville died in 1859, only 33 out of 50 states had achieved statehood, and the Civil War had not yet started. The makeup of the country has changed; the homogeneity found in Tocqueville’s time is no longer as prevalent. The population explosions and medical breakthroughs of the 1900s were still a fantasy. Social mores have changed, and moved past some of the greatest issues of the 19th century. In addition to moving past 19th century issues, new issues arose in the 20th century, such as the new acceptance of alternative lifestyles that were otherwise unspoken of or repressed in Tocqueville’s time. While there are plenty of relevant issues within Tocqueville, neither party can truly capture the values of classic American democracy with such changes to the country. *

Political Parties through the Lens of De Tocqueville, Part 3

This is part 3 of a reposting of a paper I wrote in the Spring of 2008 for Jon McFall's Democratic Political Philsophy class at Rutgers University. Certain points have been redacted for clarity, and will be noted with a *

The main issue is: which party tends to enact faith based or religious legislation? In most cases, this honor goes to the Republicans. And while Republicans have an obligation to their religious constituents to further a religious agenda, it still does not factor in many new challenges that Tocqueville did not anticipate, such as the rise and relative acceptance of atheism prevalent in current times. 
In addition, legislating morality should not happen in a society that cannot come to a true consensus of the morality. For example, while there is about 55% opposition to gay marriage, but increasingly higher acceptance rates of homosexuals, according to a series of Gallup polls , it affects enough people in enough different places that the minority would be damaged by this type of legislation. And as Tocqueville wrote, 
“[A]fter each concession the strength of the democracy increases, and its demands increase with its strength.”  

While Tocqueville applied this principle to universal suffrage, it can also be applied to the acceptance of formerly alternative lifestyles, which at first would be seen with some apprehension or fear, then understanding, then acceptance, the conclusion for gay marriage is that it will eventually become legal, and the Republican efforts to block gay marriage continue to hinder, rather than assist, the democratic process.

However, Tocqueville tended to evaluate based on more homogenized societies, microcosms of the larger federal government, which an action such as a constitutional ban on gay marriage would not be. According to a side-by-side analysis of hot button issues, Democrats prefer to take a state’s rights approach to the issue of gay marriage, while Republicans tend to outright oppose it.Tocqueville would likely praise the Democrats for this move, because of his enormous respect for home rule within American society versus European society. As Tocqueville writes,

“The political existence of the majority of the nations of Europe commenced in the superior ranks of society, and was gradually and imperfectly communicated to the different members of the social body. In America, on the other hand, it may be said that the township was organized before the county, the county before the State, the State before the Union.” 

 While Democrats have the advantage in terms of Tocquevillian politics for gay marriage, they do not win this battle across the board. According to Majorie Hershey, both parties have increased strength for local level politics since the 1970s. In particular, Michigan’s Democratic Party has seen major improvements on the county level, going from a farce of a local organization to a fully-fledged contender, thanks to help from the United Auto Workers union. Add in support from an energetic party chair such as Howard Dean, whose 50-state strategy is building an infrastructure from the bottom up to support Democrats in all state, and Democrats have a fairly solid local level organization. 

 Republicans, on the other hand, do not have as strong of county level politics. Their state parties, on the other hand, are going extremely well by comparison. Money from the Republican National Committee keeps state organizations alive, and Republicans are able to reach out to younger constituents, bringing in college age interns as an outreach program. Bringing in the younger generations helps to keep democracy fluid and alive, and with programs such as Get out the Vote (GOTV) and the internships, Republicans can make as good of a show as the Democrats can. 

Political Parties through the Lens of De Tocqueville, Part 2

This is part 2 of a reposting of a paper I wrote in the Spring of 2008 for Jon McFall's Democratic Political Philsophy class at Rutgers University. Certain points have been redacted for clarity, and will be noted with a *

But politics and democracy are more than pure numbers. For Tocqueville, religion plays a major role. According to Tocqueville, 

“Religion is no less the companion of liberty in all its battles and its triumphs; the cradle of its infancy, and the divine source of its claims. The safeguard of morality is religion, and morality is the best security of law and the surest pledge of freedom.”  
With that in mind, one can see the high emphasis de Tocqueville puts on religion as a foundation of American democracy. However, according to John Petrocik, religion has become more important to parties within the past twenty years. The main force of the Republican Party has become observant and higher class religious voters, composing nearly 60% of its constituency. By raising the profile of religious voters within the party, the Republicans are inching closer to reincorporating the two elements Tocqueville admires, religion and liberty.
However, in a modern society, there should be a certain amount of room for religious diversity, which Tocqueville did not have to take into account, but Democrats do. While Republicans have conservative, religiously observant white males in an overwhelming amount, the Democrats have every other main religious group under their wing. Jewish voters overwhelming vote Democrat, and Arabic and Muslim voters appear to have jumped ship from the Republicans to the Democrats since the Iraq War started. 
However, the problem begins again when noting how far religious legislation goes. Tocqueville criticizes New England of the 17th century for its religious legislation. He cites examples, ranging from compulsory church attendance, to blue laws punishing innkeepers for selling more liquor than allotted, to fines and beating for merely lying (making Puritan New England a very dangerous place for future presidents Nixon and Clinton). However, he does defend it as an exercise of the majority rule of the colonists.